In copyright infringement, how does intent affect liability under strict liability?

In copyright infringement, how does intent affect liability under strict liability?

• A. Intent does not matter; liability exists if infringement occurred.
• B. Intent must be proven to assess liability.
• C. Only intentional infringements are liable.
• D. Intent determines damages.

Answer: (A)

Under strict liability for copyright infringement, liability attaches simply because the infringement occurred, regardless of the infringer’s intent. The plaintiff must show ownership of a valid copyright and that copying or an act that infringes exclusive rights happened; the infringer’s mental state isn’t needed to establish liability. This means someone who copies work by accident can still be liable. Intent can influence remedies—courts may award enhanced damages or other penalties if the infringement is willful—but it does not determine whether liability exists in the first place.

Under strict liability for copyright infringement, liability attaches simply because the infringement occurred, regardless of the infringer’s intent. The plaintiff must show ownership of a valid copyright and that copying or an act that infringes exclusive rights happened; the infringer’s mental state isn’t needed to establish liability. This means someone who copies work by accident can still be liable. Intent can influence remedies—courts may award enhanced damages or other penalties if the infringement is willful—but it does not determine whether liability exists in the first place.